Skip to content

Discover, compare, and decide — diligently.

The enterprise AI buying platform. Compare 800+ vendors, run AI Due Diligence, score by business-context fit, and design your target stack — the evidence a CIO, CISO, and board need to sign off an AI purchase.

29/50
AI DUE DILIGENCE

Harvey

AI-NativeHigh risk
12345
1Classification
10/10
2Model Independence
3/10
3Learning Loop
8/10
4Data Sovereignty
5/10
5Dependency
3/10
Free to start — no cardDue diligence on 730+ vendorsScored from public evidenceRanked to your context
800+
VENDORS
158
CATEGORIES
25
INDUSTRIES
116
OUTCOMES
THE PROBLEM

Enterprise AI buying is broken.

Three patterns every CIO, CISO, and AI buyer will recognise.

01

Vendors pitch. Buyers guess.

Every AI vendor demo looks the same. Capabilities sound impressive. Architecture is opaque. Risk surfaces after the contract.

02

Analyst reports are slow.

Magic Quadrants publish annually. AI architecture changes quarterly. By the time a category report lands, half the vendor claims are stale.

03

Risk shows up after signing.

Dependency on one model provider. Data leaking through an API. An "AI team" that turns out to be three consultants. Procurement finds out last.

HOW IT WORKS

Context. Discover. Decide.

Three stages. One platform. Replaces the stitched-together workflow of marketing sites, analyst PDFs, and shared spreadsheets.

STEP 01

Set context

Build your company profile once. Industry, risk tolerance, compliance requirements, and AI maturity — every recommendation adjusts to fit.

STEP 02

Discover & compare

Browse 800+ vendors across four lenses. Compare side-by-side with capability scoring and AI Due Diligence signals.

STEP 03

Decide

Score solutions with context-fit weighting. Design your target stack. Export the decision record your CIO, CISO, and procurement will sign.

CAPABILITIES

Everything you need to decide on AI vendors.

Six capabilities, one integrated platform. From discovery to due diligence to a signed-off procurement decision — without the spreadsheet chaos.

Business Context

Build your company profile once — industry, risk tolerance, compliance requirements, AI maturity. Every recommendation, comparison, and shortlist automatically adjusts to fit.

LEARN MORE →

Vendor Comparison

Side-by-side scoring across 1,700+ capabilities. Weight what matters, filter the rest, and export a shareable report.

LEARN MORE →

AI Due Diligence

Classification, dependency risk, data sovereignty, and three trust scores on each profiled vendor — Model Independence, Learning Loop, Data Sovereignty. Defensible to procurement.

LEARN MORE →

Technology Stack

Map the AI tools you run today. See capability gaps, surface where you may be paying twice for overlapping tools, and get a ranked plan to consolidate.

LEARN MORE →

Solution Scoring

Structured RFI and weighted scoring with business context-fit built in. Capture rationale, collaborate with stakeholders, and export the decision record.

LEARN MORE →

MCP & API

Query the full catalog from Claude, Cursor, Cline, or any MCP-compatible AI assistant — or hit the Catalog API over HTTP. Included in Premium.

LEARN MORE →
A GLIMPSE OF WHAT'S INSIDE

Real vendor scores and capability matrices.

Sample from AI Security. Sign up to see every category, every vendor, every score.

Top AI Security Vendors
by score
Sign up to see all 0 vendors →
BEYOND THE CAPABILITY MATRIX

The due diligence analyst reports don't publish.

Compare to the hero above: Harvey is AI-native but high-dependency — it builds on frontier model APIs. Anthropic is AI-native with low dependency because it owns its model stack end-to-end. Same "ai-native" label, very different durability. That architectural nuance is what DD surfaces.

  • Classification: AI-native, AI-augmented, or AI-overlay
  • Dependency risk: what breaks if a provider changes
  • Model ownership, Data moat, Continuous Learning
  • 3 quantitative trust scores on a 1–10 scale (Model Independence, Learning Loop, Data Sovereignty)
Explore AI Due Diligence
46/50
AI DUE DILIGENCE

Anthropic

AI-NativeLow risk
12345
1Classification
10/10
2Model Independence
9/10
3Learning Loop
8/10
4Data Sovereignty
9/10
5Dependency
10/10
DISCOVER

Four ways to find vendors.

Same 800+ vendor dataset, four entry points. Start from wherever your question begins.

ASK YOUR AI ASSISTANT

Query vendors, solutions, capabilities, and AI Due Diligence data directly from Claude, Cursor, Cline, or any MCP-compatible assistant — 18 read-only tools. Included in Premium.

PLANS

Free to explore. Paid plans for the full platform.

Pay monthly or yearly — yearly saves 20%.

FREE
$0
forever

Research every vendor and solution, with AI Due Diligence signals.

Sign up free
RECOMMENDED
STANDARD
$25
per month · or $240/year

The full platform for one buyer.

Get Standard
PREMIUM
$75
per month · or $720/year

For a team deciding together.

Get Premium

Frequently asked

It's a decision system for enterprise AI buying — business context drives ranked, due-diligence-backed recommendations; you compare, score, and decide with rationale captured; the platform tracks whether it delivered.

Your AI stack has gaps. Find them in 2 minutes.

800+ vendors. Independent AI Due Diligence. Free to start.

Get started free